Chris Trotter, well-known in NZ as a ‘left’
commentator, rubbishes those calling for
revolution to solve the crisis in Venezuela. He describes the power of the
armed forces of modern states and then asks revolutionaries “how big is your
army?” compared to that of Maduro.
Clearly, he wants workers to put their trust in Maduro to defend
Venezuela against any imperialist intervention rather than arm themselves to resist imperialism, win over the ranks of the army, and replace Maduro’s‘Bolivarian’ bourgeois regime with a workers and poor farmers’ government.
Trotter has always had a distaste for the
revolutionary masses, from the time when he wrote off the Red Fed and backed
the social democratic road to socialism in Aotearoa in his book No Right Turn. The role of social
democracy (those self-proclaimed labourite leaders in the unions and in government)
is to disarm the masses and capitulate to the capitalist state. To speak only
about how 'socialist' Maduro has a big loyal army ignores the urgency of
splitting the ranks from the officer command to supply arms to the workers
loyal to Maduro to form militias capable of defeating a determined US-sponsored
coup.
Chile 1973 is evidence of what happens when reformists
rely on a self-professed 'socialist' leader who actively opposes arming the masses. Germany 1919 is an example of armed mutineers
capable of taking power being disarmed by a deal between the reformist 2nd
International Social Democracy and the German ruling class. The positive
example is Russia 1917 when the armed workers, soldiers and peasants’ soviets
took power and defended and defeated an imperialist invasion in a four-year
civil war.
The history lesson is, never rely on social democratic
politicians or popular fronts if you want to make a revolution. The masses have
the ability to arm and defeat the forces of both social democracy and fascism. A
current example is the Anti-Fa mobilization in the US recounted in this issue. Social
democracy will always slag off the revolutionary left as 'unrealistic', ‘ultraleft’
and ‘sectarian’, as a way of blaming workers for not being ready for revolution. A cheap and nasty disarming and diverting of workers
onto the parliamentary road and into the arms of fascism.
The most significant test case of armed workers
organising today is what is happening in the USA. The dominant but declining world power
with a Bonapartist leader (who claims to stand for the nation ‘above classes’ but
is covertly serving reactionary classes) capable of moving right to an open
fascist regime using petty bourgeois armed gangs to openly attack working class
organisations. That is the cue for the outbreak of an armed US civil war,
actually a 'class war', between armed workers and armed capitalists that is the
inevitable result of the decline and decay of US imperialism.
Of course, such regimes attempt to suppress the armed
masses at home by embarking on more imperialist adventures and invasions of neo-colonies
like Venezuela in the name of the ‘war on terror’. US military adventures will
come up against its major rivals, Russia and China, causing more genocides and bigger
wars.
The outcome, socialism or
barbarism, will depend on organized armed worker self defence against a right
Bonapartist or Fascist regime, and refusal to fight foreign wars against
oppressed countries or imperialist rivals. Just as the German and Russian workers
and soldiers did 100 years ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment