Showing posts with label positive feedbacks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label positive feedbacks. Show all posts

Saturday, December 07, 2013

Review of 'Going Dark'




by Guy R. McPherson
Publish America, Baltimore, 2013.

Guy McPherson is rapidly gaining a reputation as Guy ‘McStinction’ as the climate scientist who is predicting near-term human extinction “beyond the 2030”s. He makes the case that Climate Collapse (CC) is upon us and that only industrial collapse could stop it. When that happens we as a species will as he says, “Go dark” as it becomes extinct. The 26 positive feedback loops (PFLs – causal chains that are self-reinforcing and increase exponentially) are many and almost all are already beyond human control. McPherson accepts that against all odds there are (currently) two positive feedbacks that we can influence. These are the ones that set all the other PFLs in motion. Broadly they are the extraction and burning of fossil fuel. The only way McPherson thinks we can reverse and stop those positive feedbacks is for industrial civilisation to collapse. 


The problem is that while McPherson has the scientific credentials to understand and explain CC, he lacks these credentials when it comes to explaining the industrial civilisation that caused it. One requirement of science is that if you are postulating human action to stop an effect you need to understand the cause. Before we talk about ‘industrial society’ collapsing we need to know what it is and how to make it collapse.

McPherson has a good grasp of industrial society as that of ‘empire’ controlled by corporations. He sees industrial society ruled by those in power now using a police state and NSA to keep a hold over the people. He hoped that the Global Financial Crisis of 2008 would bring about the collapse of industrial society. But that did not happen. The big banks and big business rallied with big bailouts and bonuses from big government that then turned the big cops on Occupy. Far from collapsing, the monopoly capitalist state then embarked on a crash program to extract and burn all known fossil fuels to boost profits. What will it take to build a citizens crash program to stop the corporate crash program turning the planet into a ball of fire? McPherson’s response to this is the need for ‘total revolution’, ‘anarchy’ and ‘freedom’ but he has no road map for how this can be made possible. This is the main problem with Going Dark and the rest of this review is about spelling out that crash socialist program for survival.

Capitalist crisis meets Climate Catastrophe

Why didn’t the 2008 GFC bring about the collapse of industrial civilisation? The short answer is that the capitalist class did not allow it to collapse and the working class did not make it. Industry is capitalist industry owned and controlled by capitalists. They are motivated by profits which they screw out of the working class surplus-value. Capitalism is a dynamic contradiction. It develops technology to increase labor productivity to get more surplus-value out of workers. But the consequence of this is the increase in investment in the tools of production (machines etc) that cannot produce value, relative to the wages of productive workers, who do. This is the famous organic composition of capital. This sows the seeds of crisis in the form of the Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall (TRPF). The capitalists fight the TRPF with counter-tendencies, plundering the world for cheap resources, cutting wages, and of course inventing better machines to make labor more productive.

But inevitably the capitalists cannot screw enough surplus value out of workers to make a profit on their investment and the TRPF wins. A crisis of falling profits results leading to a fall in investment, the classic capitalist slump, and an overproduction of capital which must be devalued to restore the rate of profit. The last major slump began in the 1970s but despite devaluations of capital, particularly in the neo-liberal years, surplus capital remained. It found an outlet in speculating in existing values creating fictitious values was above true values. 


The 2008 GFC was a collapse of several of these overvalued speculative markets, beginning with housing but spreading to the whole banking system. To prevent this system collapsing along with these fictitious values, the banks were bailed out by central banks which created $trillions of debt to be paid for by future generations of workers in cuts to living standards - hours, wages, pensions, conditions etc. But $trillions of fictitious values remain to be destroyed before profits recover back to their post-WW2 boom levels.

The GFC did not lead to the collapse of industrial civilisation because it was no more than a symptom of that long decline as capitalism exhausts its capacity to plunder the earth and the labor value of workers sufficient to sustain its profits. The capitalist class treated the symptom of an ailing capitalism but it has not yet been able to cure the disease – falling profits. 


This explains why the ruling class is ruthlessly mining, drilling, fracking the earth, and ruthlessly spying, militarising, and repressing workers, activists and ‘terrorists’ who resist its headlong rush to destruction. It is the crisis-ridden capitalist system in extremis that accounts for the polarisation of the global population where the ruling class, with its political parties, fake social movements, and media bullshit oppress the global working class which is fighting to survive as part of the natural world that parasitic capitalism threatens to make extinct. This contradiction is becoming more extreme and can be resolved in favour of nature and humanity only by the international working class, the proletariat, overthrowing and replacing the capitalist system.

Green capitalists and socialists

McPherson’s terms, ‘anarchism’, ‘freedom’ and ‘total revolution’ are subversive concepts, but they need to be translated into revolutionary strategy and tactics to overthrow capitalism. Logically, ‘total revolution’ is the only course of action in stopping the positive feedbacks still within our control. If we succeed then survival makes ‘Freedom’ possible. But are ‘Anarchism’, ‘ecosocialism’ and even ‘Marxism’ up to the task? The first test is to reject ‘Green Capitalism’ which is both utopian and reactionary. Utopian, because capitalism cannot coexist in harmony with nature; reactionary because it limits itself to “peaceful civil disobedience” as a sort of passive-aggressive behavior; activist against the ‘corporate elite’ but pacifist against capitalism. 


Who are the Green Capitalists? James Hansen calling for more nuclear power; Bill McKibben’s 350.org and anti-Keystone campaigns funded by Rockefeller and other business foundations to the tune of $10 million to stop the tar-sands and shale fracking; Climate Ground Zero and the defenders of Coal River Mountain, or Greenpeace climate activism all over the world. All assume civil disobedience can stop fossil fuel burning without overthrowing capitalism. While they ‘act out’ this passive aggression the positive feedbacks keep burning us up.

‘Total Revolution’ also means going beyond Green Socialism (or ecosocialism) which claims that socialism can be achieved by redistributing the world’s wealth and imposing sustainable growth without smashing the capitalist state and creating a centralised workers’ government. This is Green capitalism with a socialist gloss. It deludes workers into the belief that capitalists can be made to forgo their carbon burning destructive profiteering without making workers pay dearly with loss of livelihoods and loss of lives. A prominent advocate of Green Socialism is John Bellamy Foster, Professor of Sociology at the University of Oregon. Foster shares with the Green capitalists the belief that we have the time to mobilise to stop climate change by pushing for reforms. 


He critiques Hansen et al for failing to see that capitalism will repress any direct action to enforce a carbon tax yet still pins his hopes on such reforms leading to the development of revolutionary consciousness. Such reforms include a carbon tax, opposition to capitalist waste and capitalist growth that does not meet real needs and so on. The problem is we do not have the time to struggle for reforms that may lead to revolution. Marxists have always argued that reforms only result when the bosses want to head off a revolution. We have to take action now to shut down oil and gas plants as well as the major industries that rely on them such as the auto and plastics industries. We also have to warn that mass direct action targeting the ruling class right to rule will bring down the spy, anti-terror state forces on activists and make it necessary to abandon the reformist road for the revolutionary road.

‘Total Revolution’ and Survival Socialism


For Marx the forces of production included nature (importantly the labor-power of workers) that was subordinated to capitalist production for profit. The capitalist exploitation of nature did at that time not pose Climate Catastrophe. Today we are faced with consequences of centuries of capitalist plunder – a blowback by nature. This is not anthropogenic but capitalogenic Climate Collapse. For thousands of years before capitalism humans had to coexist as part of nature. So it is not ‘human’ agency but capitalist agency that destroys the forces of production in its mad rush to exhaust millions of years of stored up carbon. For revolutionary Marxists capitalism is lived past its due date. A socialist revolution is long overdue to stop the massive destruction of the forces of production (nature).

Yet while socialist revolution is necessary now there can be no immediate transition to a socialist society in which newly invented technology will allow the forces of production to develop in harmony with nature allowing a reduction in labor, a conservation of energy and basic need of all met. First, the destruction of nature has to be stopped. The immediate priority will be the conservation of resources while a transition to new technology is developed along with a global plan that reorganises production on the basis of meeting the basic needs of all. For revolutionary Marxists then, ‘total Revolution’ means overthrowing capitalism and replacing it with a transitional workers government that acts to stop the carbon burning feedback loops. Only if and when that has been achieved can production be planned sustainably to meet the needs of the 7 billion earthlings.

Climate change demands a ‘total revolution’ to dump corporate capitalism. ‘Anarchism’ is not sufficient. Anarchism is premised on the petty bourgeois individual who is a creature of capitalism. The proletariat is also the creation of capitalism but it is also the progressive class within capitalism whose historic mission is to be the ‘gravedigger’ of capitalism and the builder of socialism. The proletariat needs to control and conserve its productive forces to survive as part of nature. Grass roots movements like Idle No More, trade unions and community activists etc., need to join forces as the universal struggle of the proletariat. This is class war. We need to organise democratically but act globally. This requires an international organisation – a world socialist party. We must take the power and wealth off the ruling class – take over the Banks and all the big business.. We must smash their state apparatus that indoctrinates us, spies on us and represses us.

The positive feedback revolution can stop is the capitalist exploitation of nature as the source of corporate profits. We as workers are the source of those profits. Our labor-power (along with the rest of nature) is the source of all wealth. We need to mobilise our own class power. We have to build a system of workers power to defeat the state power of the ruling class. That power has to be based on its source – our labor. We need to withdraw our labor in many strike actions that build into a General Strike that shuts down capitalist production world-wide. To hold onto this power we need to occupy the workplaces and defend them against the armed forces of the state. 


All of this will mean a program for an alternative society. This will start with local strike committees and defence committees that coordinate nationally and internationally. Here the various currents of anarchism, socialism and Marxism will debate strategy and tactics to win support for the best course of action. Arising from such committees will grow councils or communes where the working people will debate political tactics and plan the production of the good and services that we need to survive. There is no guarantee that we can do this, or that it will be enough to stop Capitalist Climate Collapse. But there is no way that generation Zero will go quietly into the night. And for revolutionary Marxists there is no question that we go with a bang and not a whimper!

Monday, April 01, 2013

Socialism vs Climate Catastrophe


This graphic shows the extent of Arctic sea ice on Aug. 26, 2012, the day the sea ice dipped to its smallest extent in more than three decades of satellite measurements, according to scientists from NASA and the National Snow and Ice Data Center. (Image: NASA)
The standard social democratic view of ‘eco-socialism’ is that we can reform capitalism to avoid Climate Catastrophe (CC). For example:

Ecosocialism is at the junction of anti-capitalist environmentalism and socialism free from productivism, in a project that proposes an alternative society of hope. This is no utopia with which reality should comply, but a rational human response to the double impasse of capitalism and the obsession with productivity. Our thoughts and political actions are radical: they go to the root causes. We therefore fight what drives the system: consumerism geared towards material accumulation thus widening social inequalities, the productivity-oriented system which exhausts our ecosystem’s resources, the globalisation of the economy that allows for social and environmental dumping. We point to the real culprits: the financial oligarchy and the ideologists who advocate "free and fair" competition and trade.”

 Near-Term Extinction


Yet if we continue to use fossil fuels in this way for the next 20 years in futile attempts to reform capitalism this will guarantee we have no future. Why, because 2 degrees becomes 6 degrees and with catastrophic consequences. The most recent scenario from Guy McPherson shows that we are headed for ‘near-term’ human extinction whatever we do. He says that we can prolong the term of the extinction by collapsing industrial society now. But of course as a non-Marxist he does not say it is capitalism rather than industrialism as such that is the problem.

While McPherson talks of stopping Arctic drilling as the one positive feedback that we could control, he does not envisage the link between this and a wider social revolution globally that can make a difference on how long we have got. The point is we need a socialist revolution to take advantage of the advances in green technology. For example mining Lithium in Bolivia is open to technical improvements in method of production while the Morales populist government is in power. A leftist Governments could enter into progressive green trade swaps, but obviously this has to take place on a global scale to have any effect on climate change.

Can China save the world?


We don’t think that China is a socialist regime but its working class can demand major changes if mobilised. China is actually leading in green technology purely in order to avoid the increasing costs of relying on fossil fuels. Of course to catch up and compete with its rivals China has become the the biggest emitter. That’s why who rules China is decisive. The biggest factor that we should be pushing hard is the capacity of the Chinese working class to overthrow the CCP and implement a socialist plan for survival.

When science tells us what is necessary to survive, then it becomes clear that this requires collective action to remove the barriers to survival. The problem with even the most radical CC position (eg McPherson) is that its economic assumptions are still based on the market and bourgeois individualism. They may be top climate scientists but they are still no more than bourgeois individuals appealing to other individuals to refuse to participate in capitalism rather than organising to smash capitalism

The biggest barrier is the capitalist system, its state apparatus and its corporate media that treats CC as a technical or market problem. Any political party that still thinks that bourgeois parliament is a means of escaping or limiting CC is part of the problem. It is invested in a political institution that is the sum of its individual citizens. It’s designed to facilitate and defend the market, not eliminate it as the agent of human extinction!

How to stop human extinction

How to stop near-term human extinction? It’s obvious that this requires a social revolution and who is going to do that other than revolutionaries? Revolution as the alternative to human extinction doesn’t get the usual ‘leftwing nutter’ response today except from right wing nutters. Nothing is worse than extinction. Nothing concentrates the mind like the fear of losing everything. We need a socialist plan now to work out how to collectively get rid of capitalism and implement the necessary survival measures. Here is a proposed plan for discussion:

First: Energy. All production based on fossil fuels needs to stop and be replaced by renewable fuels. The energy sources will need to be those which don’t put carbon into the atmosphere. We need to renationalise under workers control the power companies, and the national grid and plan renewable energy use. Solar power and electric technology can be developed more rapidly if they don’t depend on the profit motive

Second: Industry. Most capitalist owners of industry will never agree to immediate conversion to non-carbon burning fuels so will have to be nationalised under workers control and management. Those that do use HEP can be converted such as the Tiwai Pt Aluminium Smelter to produce aluminium for solar panels and vehicles etc. NZ Steel would be renationalised and upgraded to the latest electric smelters based on local iron sand.

Third: Land-use. Intensive dairying and other monocrop production needs to be diversified and converted to organic to stop chemical pollution and despoliation of land and water. This will mean a state policy of nationalising land and allocating resources like water, and replacing capitalist production with collective production, while compensating small producers.

Fourth: Work. We need a state run policy of Public Works that creates full employment. All work would be divided among those who want to work and hours reduced until there was full employment. There would be a guaranteed living wage based on the average wage, and no worker would earn more than double the living wage.

Fifth: Social Security. State provided secular education, comprehensive health and housing would meet the need for fit, healthy and skilled workers. Technical education and Research would be directed at new technologies. For those who cannot work there will be a social wage at set at the level of the living wage. All private provision of health, education and other social services will be phased out without compensation.

Sixth: Transport. Transport would be converted to electricity and public transport expanded. Converting cars and short range trucks to electricity is feasible. Biodiesel would be a stopgap measure. NZR workshops could produce aluminium rolling stock, buses and containers.. Reviving coastal shipping using biodiesel is another option.

Seventh: Finance. All banks would be nationalised and turned into a single State Bank. Farmers who chose to lease nationalised land collectively or individually would get bank loans to convert their production. All ACC, EQC and insurance would be nationalised under workers control.

Eighth: Trade. Planning the economy cannot be done in isolation of the global economy. Nobody wants to go back to pre-industrial self-reliance based on outdated technology. NZ can develop its economy to produce what is most efficient and sustainable, and trade with other countries for their products. For example let’s trade our dairy products for Bolivia’s lithium for batteries and for China’s rare earths.

A state-managed plan capable of the above would clearly be based on a ‘socialist’ plan. All of this is possible if we have the will to survive. None of this is compatible with capitalism which is hell bent on destruction. It would take a socialist revolution backed by the majority working class to put a Government of Workers’ Councils in power to conceive, plan and implement this survival strategy.

To achieve this plan would require a process of democratic planning able to assess and prioritise people’s needs and resource use to meet those needs. This would include the use of human labour and the how much of the product went to workers for their labour compared to collective savings for a social development fund to increase productivity and reduce work hours. The only thing between us and extinction is socialism.

Capitalism is the problem and the solution is socialism!