Showing posts with label social welfare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social welfare. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 03, 2011
Welfare Nazis a big hit in Aotearoa
Revival of old hit by the #Welfare #Nazis coming to Aotearoa soon. Sponsored by NACTs, Maxim Institute and UK Centre for Social Justice. Lineup: Ian Duncan-Smith, Paula Rebstock, Paula Bennett, Janet Grossman. First came to prominence as the Chicago Boys in the '70s, with smash hit 'Pinochet', then the Reaganites Contra band in the '80s with No1 hit #WisconsinWay. Went on in the '90s to record "Welfare to Work" a cover of the 1930s Depression hit by Fred Hayek. Revived for current world tour by global crisis, rising austerity, impending bankruptcy to raise the stocks of the declining old bands, and try to counter the popular appeal of the new genre of #indignatos sweeping the world #worldrevolution.#fb
Ian Duncan-Smith, founder of the British think tank Centre for Social Justice, visited Aotearoa recently as guest of the Maxim Institute. As the Con-Dem Minister of Work and Pensions he is now responsible for implementing the policies generated by his think tank. Basically these policies are summed up as 'work-fare'. The NACT regime is basing much of its approach to welfare on the same politics of welfare-to-work. This originated in the US in particular the ‘Wisconsin Way’, and was picked up by a 1997 “Beyond Dependency” Conference in NZ. These ideas are derived ultimately from the revival of ‘liberal’ political economy of the Austrian school, in particular Von Mises and Hayek.
Today, the NACTs are drawing inspiration from British neo-liberal theory on welfare being implemented by the Con-Dem regime. They have head-hunted one of the UK senior officials, Janet Grossman, responsible for implementing a shift from Jobcentres to Callcentres, cutting jobs, saving money by putting services online and creating financial disincentives to getting benefits. Here's a quote from a British parliamentary committee before which Ms Grossman appeared:
"...let us congratulate Ms Grossman, shall we - if we read her CV we see that: "Under Janet's leadership, the Pension Service operations have improved efficiency and customer service, reducing staff numbers by 26% whilst improving service levels in the last 18 months". She has done a fantastic job and I pay tribute to her. When we need to summon you back in a couple of years' time, which I will obviously do, will you be able to tell us that Ms Grossman has been promoted and received a pay rise but those responsible for a lagging performance elsewhere have been sacked and moved on?"
The transcript is hilarious, especially the cross questioning by one Austin Mitchell, Labour MP for Grimsby (of Quarter-acre-Pavlova Paradise fame) who asks are the customers told midway thru their phone call how much it is costing them?
That was 2006, so it’s likely she has probably turned 100s of jobcentres into callcentres to get people to chase jobs over the phone or online (with services contracted to the private sector where Ms Grossman has much experience).
Sounds like she's been head hunted to do the same job here getting people off welfare and into...workfare!
Which Paula Bennett is already doing eh? When 2/3rds of 'youth not working' are not registered as unemployed. There aint no jobs! The pay off here will be outsourcing IT solutions, forcing customers to pay for long phone calls assuming you have a landline, and why would you with a cellphone anyway. Its keep your cellphone lose your benefit. Then there's the compulsory detox or else. Then employing Union-organised security guards to harass them off the streets. Crazy capitalism where efficiency is chopping people off the books while outsourcing the methods so that only social services that can make a profit survive.
Wednesday, June 01, 2011
Bludger’s Budget
Kiwisaver: State cuts back its contributions, appears to put the burden equally on workers and employers, but in fact allows employers to take it off wage increases. Thus kiwisaver becomes like a US type worker contribution pension fund that will amount to workers saving for their pension, with companies contribution deducted from their wages, while at the same time the state will cut back on Govt Superannuation, raise the age of entitlement etc/, thus shifting the burden of paying for retirement entirely onto workers. That amounts to a real wage cut and a rise in the rate of exploitation. If Kiwisaver is privatised then workers may end up like US workers who have had their corporate based pension schemes worth billions expropriated to bail out company bankruptcies. Privatised pensions have fine print which says the bosses own your retirement as well as your working life! The only secure retirement for workers is to expropriate the expropriators, not only the pension funds but all the corporate wealth the workers created through their generations of labour.
WFF: Working for Families was a Labour Party policy to redistribute tax (actually a tax rebate like the old rebate for children) to workers who had families. So it’s part of the welfare system. The NACTs opposed it when it was introduced but then left it in place until now when they have reduced the rebates slightly for families on higher incomes probably because this is ‘middle NZ’ and potentially NACT voters. And lots of other nasty, mean cuts where it hurts.
Privatisation: NACTs propose the partial privatisation of a number of specified State-owned Enterprises – namely the four major power generators, Solid Energy and Air New Zealand. In an attempt to head off popular opposition to privatisation the NACTs propose ‘partial privatisation’ i.e. 49% private ownership 51% retained in public ownership. These are major corporations with good returns. So what the NACTs are doing here is grabbing nearly half for their own class, here and overseas. They are trying to sweeten the pill by saying ‘mum and dad’ investors will get preference and this will boost kiwi ownership and the NZX. Well, those mum and dad shares will be gobbled up by corporates damn quick. Campaign Against Foreign Control of Aotearoa [CAFCA} has a good critique form the standpoint of NZ social democracy, that state ownership implies more public control than private foreign ownership. In fact nationalisation is a form of collective capitalist ownership since the state is the state of the capitalist class. What nationalisation does, however, is facilitate workers control as a step towards the socialisation of capitalist property. So the answer to the NACTs ‘part privatisation’ plans is to fight for nationalised property to be under workers control and for the big private corporates to be nationalised, without compensation, and under workers control.
ACC: The NACT wants to privatise Accident Compensation; another step towards destroying the working class as the only force able to stop social barbarism and human extinction. The whole point of privatising is to open up lucrative business to bosses and make the workers pay for it. It’s an ideological reform sure, but it’s driven at every level by profits. Ideas don’t exist without material roots. Bosses are looking to drive down the costs of insuring workers on the job and paying for their accidents off the job, and insurance companies are looking to make more profits from user pays. The pro-market ideology is just that. They want ACC privatised to shift the cost onto workers. Reformist complaints about the ACC meeting some noble ideal of the ‘community’ sharing the cost of accidents is a nonsense for capital which uses up the flesh and blood of workers, exhausts nature, and drives humanity towards extinction, to make a profit. Social democratic appeals to some redeeming feature of capitalism is merely avoiding the calamity and weakening our ability to stop it in time. What has the Labour Party got to say about this Bludgers’ Budget?
Labour’s shadow Budget
Labour opposes the cuts in the Bludgers’ Budget but has not committed itself to restoring them. It has made a point of saying that some cuts would still be necessary given the worsening debt situation. It has promised a small tax increase for high income families and to impose the Environmental Trading Scheme [ETS] on farmers in 2013 to raise $800 million over the next four years for R&D. It committed to raising the minimum wage from $13 to $15 on hour. NACT and big business hit back with claim that this would lose 5000 jobs unless Youth rates were reintroduced. Labourites have countered with research that showed that raising the minimum wage in the US and in NZ did not see rising youth unemployment as hours worked by youth increased (see Tapu Misa). These research findings prove the Marxist view that rising wages are the spur to growth in economic productivity as employers are pressured to introduce new technology and raise labour productivity to increase profits. The immense growth of capitalism over the last 150 years arises from this pressure.
The Labour Party recognises the importance of labour productivity growth but but does not see this as increased exploitation of labour and limits itself to strengthening organised labour to win a larger share of income. Yet the statistics show that in NZ the productivity share of workers has declined to the point that even real wages have fallen. While Labour’s reformist perspective of maximising workers income shares in the imperialist epoch of capitalism in decline cannot stop mass poverty, at least it is not openly complicit like the Maori Party in the NACTs bosses’ agenda of NZ as a low-wage-asset-stripping country competing directly with other low wage countries!
A Workers’ Budget
For the NACTs a ‘workers budget’ is what they have to produce at the WINZ office to prove they are not ‘bludgers’ and can qualify for a benefit. Enough! The real Bludgers’ Budget is part of the NACTs attack on workers to create a cheap labour force and smash resistance to privatisation and asset sales to China. Labour has yet to take a stand on a Budget that puts workers needs before profits. The Green’s 5 point alternative budget has some immediate aims but spoiled by its dream of managing capitalism as a “sustainable, prosperous and fair economy” when it has to be overthrown as a precondition to our survival.
The closest we got to a Workers Budget in Parliament was when Hone Harawira of Te Mana Party described the Bludgers’ Budget as the “Key / Turia / Brash “Watch me clap while my people get shafted again” Budget. I have seen GST go up, food prices go up, petrol prices go up, house prices go up, unemployment go up, while the only thing to come down is taxes for the rich, and I intend to propose a radical way forward that will: • ease the plight of the poor • scare the shit out of the rich • and give Maori hope for a better future.
We say Enough! Tumeke! Outrage! Indignity!
Reverse the cuts! Occupy the foreshore and seabed!
Occupy all workplaces that close or sack workers!
Nationalise all corporate assets without compensation and under workers control!
Build workers councils everywhere!
For a general strike against the system that is destroying us all in the name of profit!
We say outrage > revolution > expropriation > socialism!
Saturday, March 28, 2009
WE WON’T PAY FOR THEIR CRISIS!
The time of crisis…
Worldwide workers are being laid off en mass as the capitalist crisis deepens and intensifies. Workers are losing their homes and families are breaking up as they are being made to pay for a crisis created by the system that never enriched anyone but the bosses. The International Labour Organisation predicts 50 Million jobs lost globally this year while in the USA 600,000 jobs are being lost monthly.
In Aotearoa 7% unemployment is predicted, with 20% for Maori. In Auckland the unemployment rate has doubled in the last year. 100s of jobs have been lost from F&P, CHH, Sealords etc. Many more companies are going to shed workers. Meanwhile the government’s 9 day fortnight looks like it might save a few hundred only. Bosses’ don’t want to pay for it and workers don’t want to lose 10% of their wages.
On behalf of the bosses the Key government is taking advantage of the crisis by making it easier for smaller employers to fire workers within 90 days without having to give a reason. Unemployed job seekers who decline to ‘voluntarily’ sign the 90-day clause in employment contracts are likely to face the grim prospect of a stand down or punitive benefit cuts from WINZ.
…is a time to get organised:
What can you as an individual do? Nothing! It has been proved time and again that united and organised in unions the working class are a mighty force. Because of this bosses’ governments have always tried to weaken or smash the union movement. Under the last Labour Government law changes and eco-nomic growth allowed the unions to survive.
Unions like Unite were able to begin recruiting young casualised workers in fast food outlets like McDonalds for the first time in many years, bring an end to Youth Rates, and get a rise in the minimum wage. But today these small gains and the very existence of the unions is under attack once more with the 90 Day Act which will drive down wages and conditions.
Only by joining the unions and getting organised can we unite as a labour movement to defend our in-terests and fight for jobs for all and equal rights for employed and un-employed. For rank and file democ-ratic control of the unions!
The fightback is under way
In USA and elsewhere workers are occupying factories to prevent their closure. Workers at Republic Doors and Windows in Chicago oc-cupied their factory to get their redun-dancy pay and were offered the jobs back by a new owner. In Ireland a workers occupation of Waterford Crystals is holding out for the nationalisation of the plant. Com-munities are uniting to resist evictions. In Álexandra in South Africa the community has occupied 100s of vacant public houses. General strikes such as in Greece and in Guadeloupe, and mass demonstrations as in France, prove that workers can refuse to pay for their crisis!
In New Zealand we should be doing the same. When a workplace threatens sackings or closure because of the crisis, we should organise workers occupations to win support to keep the workers operating the plants. Workers should be demanding that the plants are nationalised under workers control and workers management.
In Auckland Unite! union has organised ‘Rat Patrols’ to picket employers who fire workers under the 90 day Act, and this initiative has been backed belatedly by the CTU. When the union leadership's response to these threats is totally inadequate (where are mass rallies called by the CTU?) the initiative must come from the rank-and-file. We need to organise a fightback of the ranks of the unions in the defence of every job and workplace.
Unemployed UNITE!
While our backs are against the wall! Unite! is the union for unem-ployed, and Waitemata Branch is planning collective actions to prevent the unemployed being victimised by the crisis. 100% effectiveness will require 100% participation of the unemployed. We are as yet far from achieving that, so join up and lend your weight to the struggle.
• Fight the anti-worker 90-Day Act.
• Fight stand-downs and punitive benefit slashing.
• Resist mortgagee sales
• Solidarity with all workers
• Full union rights for all unemployed
Waitemata Branch of Unite Union
Hon Secretary ph 836 9104
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

